Thought Provoking Questions: Lesson 24
ISLAM
I. Definitions -- Like many religions, Islam has its own
vocabulary to describe its beliefs. Understanding some of
its most important religious terms will be helpful in
understanding Islamic history and belief.
A. Islam -- the name of the religion which came out of
the revelations and teachings of Muhammad. Islam is the
Arabic term for “submission.”
B. Muslim -- the name given to one who adheres to the
religion of Islam. Muslim is an Arabic cognate of Islam,
meaning “one who submits.” The Muslim submits to the will
of Allah as revealed by Muhammad.
C. Allah -- the Islamic name for God. It cannot be
easily translated into English. One Muslim writer defined
it: “The word means the unique God Who possesses all the
attributes of perfection and beauty in their infinitude.
Muslims feel strongly that the English word ‘God’ does not
convey the real meaning of the word ‘Allah.”
D. Muhammad -- the common name of an Arabic man born in
the city of Mecca in A.D. 570 (d. 632). He claimed that he
was the prophet to restore true religion and the praise of
Allah throughout the world, just as Jesus Christ was a
prophet in his time for his people. Muhammad means “the one
who is praised.”
E. Quran (also spelled Koran) is Arabic for “the
recitation,” and refers to the collection of revelations
supposedly given by Allah through his archangel to Muhammad
and preserved as the Islamic scripture.
1. Muslims believe in the Law of Moses, the Psalms of
David, and the Injil, or gospel of Jesus Christ.
2. However, they believe that those scriptures were
superseded by the scripture given through Muhammad, and
that the Bible used by Christians and Jews is a distorted
version of those other scriptures.
3. Wherever the Bible contradicts Islam, the Muslim says
the Bible is incorrect.
4. Surah refers to the divisions within the Quran, and
roughly corresponds to our “chapter.”
a) The Quran contains 114 revelations, each composing
one surah or chapter.
b) The shortest revelations appear first, the longest
ones last.
c) There is no chronological arrangement in the
Quran.
5. Hadith --Also important Islamic literature, it is
Arabic for “collected traditions.” These customs provide
source material for the intricate political and social
structure of Islam.
F. Caliph -- Arabic for leader and refers to the main
leaders of Islam, especially the immediate successors of
Muhammad.
G. Âyatollah -- refers to a spiritual master or leader
in Islam.
H. Sects of Islam.
1. Sunnite -- they accept the four caliphs in direct
succession from Muhammad and no others. The Sunnis practice
a moderate form of Islamic interpretation. Ninety percent
of the Muslims in the middle east are Sunnis (e.g., 90% of
the Jordanian Muslims, 90% of the Egyptian Muslims, 90 % of
the Saudi Arabian Muslims, 98% of the Libyan Muslims).
2. Shia’ite -- second largest Muslim sect, it is more
literal in its interpretation and application of the Quran
and is much more militant and fanatical than the Sunnis.
Ninety-three percent of Iran’s Muslims are Shia’ites,
formerly led by one of the most powerful Shia’ites,
Ayatollah, Khoumeni.
3. Ahmdiyan -- another sect of note, founded in the
1800s. This small sect has produced the bulk of Islamic
apologetics against Christianity and Judaism over the last
half of the last century. They are strong proselytizers and
are active on American campuses.
4. Sufi -- this sect is the mystical sect of Islam.
Sufis are rejected by many conservative Muslims. Some Sufi
writings seem to reject unitarian monotheism of traditional
Islam for a form of “immanent pantheism.”
II. Islamic Beliefs.
A. God.
1. For the Muslim, Allah is the only true God.
a) There is no such blasphemous thing as the
“Trinity.”
b) Jesus Christ is a prophet of Allah; he is not the Son
of God or God himself (Surah 4:171).
2. The Muslim god is unapproachable by sinful man.
a) Allah is so perfect and holy He can only communicate
with mankind through a progression of angels and
prophets.
b) The Muslim God is a god of judgment, not grace; a god
of wrath rather than love.
3. The Muslim’s desire is to submit to the point where
he can hold back the judgment of Allah and, perhaps,
through the capricious whims of Allah, inherit eternal life
in an earthly paradise of gluttony and sexual
gratification.
4. Muslims have no concept of God as a loving and
compassionate Father.
B. Jesus Christ.
1. As stated above, to the Muslim Jesus Christ is just
one of many prophets of Allah; he was the prophet for his
people in his day.
a) He is not the son of God or a part of any Trinity.
(Surah 4:171).
b) He did not atone for anyone’s sins, although he
himself was sinless.
c) Jesus Christ did not die on a cross; various Muslim
traditions say that He either miraculously substituted
Judas Iscariot for himself on the cross, or that God
miraculously delivered Him from the hands of the Romans and
Jews before He could be crucified.
2. Most Muslims believe that Jesus Christ was taken
bodily into heaven without having died (Surah 4:157).
C. Sin and Salvation.
1. Sin and salvation in Islam is associated with two
concepts: works and fate (kismet).
2. Every Muslim who hopes to escape the judgment of
Allah must fulfill the works of the Five Pillars of the
Faith (Surah 10:109).
a) Recitation of the Shahadah (“There is no god but
Allah and Muhammad is the prophet of Allah”).
b) Five daily prescribed prayers (Salat or Namaz) in
Arabic. These prayers include genuflection and prostration
in the direction of the holy city, Mecca.
c) Almsgiving (Zakat), which is unlike tithing since
Muslims are only required to give one-fortieth of their
income as charitable contributions.
d) Fasting (Saum or Ruzeh) during the entire month of
Ramadan, when Muslims are supposed to fast from all food
and drink from sunrise to sunset in atonement for their own
sins over the previous year (However, after sunset many
Muslims enjoy a feast and some get up before sunrise to eat
some more before the sun rises and the fast begins
again).
e) A pilgrimage (Hajj) to Mecca, the holy city, at lest
once in a lifetime.
3. Holy war (Jihad) used to be a condition of faith, and
early Muslims believed it was their sacred duty to murder
anyone who would not embrace the one true faith. While some
contemporary Muslims downplay the requirement for Jihad, as
we shall see there are many, especially Shia’ites, who
still urge its practice.
III. Sharing the gospel with a Muslim.
A. The three key areas to discuss with a Muslim are the
nature of God, the identity and Deity of Jesus Christ, and
salvation by grace.
B. Emphasis should be placed upon the fact that the
Christian God transcends man’s finitude and sinfulness
because He cares about people individually, and He loves
individuals.
1. Divine love is a concept missing from Islam and yet
essential to human peace and happiness with God.
2. John 3:16 is a powerful witness to God’s love.
3. Many Muslins will refuse to listen when told about
Jesus, claiming that the bible is distorted and
untrustworthy.
4. They should be directed to one of the fine works
available on the inspiration of scripture. (They Word Is
Truth, Ed Young; Biblical Criticism, J. W. McGarvey;
Revelation and the Bible, edited by Carl F. H. Henry;
Inspiration and Authority of the Scriptures, Jimmy Jividen;
Special Revelation and the Word of God, Bernard Ramm; or
The Inspiration and Authority of the Bible, B. B.
Warfield.)
5. This can open the door to present the Biblical
teaching that Jesus Christ is truly God and is the only way
to salvation.
C. Next, the Muslim needs to hear that salvation does
not depend upon his worthiness, but upon the grace of God
displayed through the atonement of Jesus Christ upon the
cross.
1. No one can work his way to heaven or to Muslim
paradise.
2. The Muslim will agree that Allah could justly choose
to bar all or mankind from paradise since no man is perfect
as Allah is perfect.
3. However, Biblical salvation does not depend on man’s
perfection; in fact it is man’s imperfections that require
a Savior who pays the penalty for man’s sins.
D. Finally, the Christian should love the Muslim.
1. Muslims have a definite zeal for God.
2. Muslims desire to follow God and express their
worship of God through their lives.
3. The Christian should respect Muslims’ sincere
intentions and share with them the life-changing gospel of
Jesus Christ.
4. When a Christian can demonstrate the power of the
Word of God in his own life, using it as an example of the
joy and peace possible to those who love Jesus Christ, he
becomes an effective ambassador for Christ to the Muslim of
the opportunity to know and worship the true God rather
than Muhammad’s distorted concepts about God.
IV. Is Islam a religion of peace?
A. Following 9/11 many world leaders, led by George Bush
and Tony Blair, declared that Islam was a religion of peace
that had been “hijacked” by a few extremists.
1. The hijackers were called Islamofascists (at least
until some objected to that term and it became politically
incorrect), who were generally considered to be perverters
of a personal and peaceful faith.
2. Often connected to this view is the idea that the War
on Terror is ultimately a struggle against poverty and
ignorance, both of which breed radicalism.
a) This is a variant of the familiar tendency to assume
that if enough money is thrown at a problem it will go
away.
b) Despite the fact that Osama bin Laden is quite
wealthy, and that study after study has shown that
jihadists and even suicide bombers tend to be wealthier and
better educated than their peaceful peers, most analysts
assume that the problem of “radical Islam” is bred in the
resentment that feeds off disadvantage, and can thus be
solved by global affirmative action.
(1) A huge number of people is the West, including many
influential governmental positions, assume that poverty and
disadvantage are the “root causes” of terrorism.
(2) John Wallach, president and founder of the pacifist
group Seeds of Peace, explained,” The United States needs
more than a military response to terrorism. It needs a
humane response as well, one that signals that we, as the
greatest and richest nation on earth, care about the
suffering of the hundreds of millions of less fortunate
people throughout the world.
(3) But it is not global humanitarianism that concerns
the jihadists -- it is waging war against the infidels.
c) We fool ourselves when we imagine that the problem is
localized “Islamic fundamentalism” a “hijacking” of an
originally peaceful religion, such that the great majority
of its adherents not only do not participate in religiously
sanctioned violence, but also disapprove of it on grounds
derived from the religion itself.
(1) In reality, active jihadists, while a minority among
Muslims, base their actions in Islamic theology and are in
the ascendancy throughout the Islamic world.
(2) Nowhere in that world is there a significant
anti-jihad, anti-al Qaeda, or anti-bin Laden movement;
while Muslims worldwide rioted over cartoon in a Danish
newspaper and remarks by Pope Benedict XVI, they have never
rioted over Osama bin Laden’s supposed hijacking of their
faith.
(3) In fact, the pictures shown of the Muslim world was
of rejoicing while the Trade Towers burned and fell and
victims leaped to their deaths.
3. Most Muslims won’t join in the jihad, but not because
they don’t approve of it; Islam, as in every other
religion, the number of the actively devout is always much
smaller than the number of those who identify themselves as
members.
4. A smaller number of Muslims actively reject the jihad
and Islamist ideology, but retain cultural Islam; these
moderates, however, are much more marginalized and less
influential than most Westerners imagine.
B. There is no shortage of Muslim leaders who openly and
unapologetically proclaim the necessity of imposing Islamic
sharia law upon the world.
1. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, al Qaeda’s leader in Iraq
before he was killed in June 2006, explained his goals in
strictly religious terms: “As for our political agenda as
some people call it, so we find it summarized richly in the
saying of the Prophet (peace be upon him), ‘I have been
sent with the sword, between the hands of the hour, until
Allah is worshipped alone.’”
2. Before he left Britain one step ahead of law
enforcement and returned to his native Lebanon, the
jihadist Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad often boasted of his
intention to “transform the West into Dar Al-Islam [the
land of Islam]” and establish Islamic law on British soil.
“I want to see the black flag of Islam flying over Downing
Street,” he said, and his now disbanded al-Muhajiroun group
was dedicated to this goal.
a) The transformation of Britain into an Islamic state
could come in two ways, he explained: “If an Islamic state
arises and invades,” in which case “we will be its army and
its soldiers from within.”
b) But if no such Islamic state arises, Bakri said that
Muslims would convert the West to Islam “through
ideological invasion . . . without war and killing.”
c) Bakri’s fellow British jihadist, the now imprisoned
Sheikh Abu Hamza al-Masri, explained that this was a
universal imperative: “Allah is the only one that must be
worshipped on Earth, and the only way to guarantee this is
to control all the land masses, air, and sea and give Islam
the proper channel to be heard by the people.”
3. The idea that Muslims must fight in order to ensure
that Islam has the “proper channel to be heard by the
people” is a common teaching in the Islamic world.
a) South African mufti [an expert in the Shari'ah who
gives legal judgments called fatwas] Ebrahim Desai repeated
it in answering a question at “Islam Q & A Online.”
(1) The questioner asked, “ I have a question about
offensive jihad. Does it mean that we are to attack even
those non-Muslims [who] don’t do anything against Islam
just because we have to propagate Islam?”
(2) Desai went on to explain that “if a country doesn’t
allow the propagation of Islam to its inhabitants in a
suitable manner or creates hindrances to this, then the
Muslim ruler would be justifying [sic] in waging jihad
against this country, so that the message of Islam can
reach its inhabitants, thus saving them from the Fire of
Jahannum [Hell]. If the Kuffaar [unbelievers] allow us to
spread Islam peacefully, then we would not wage Jihad
against them.”
b) Al-Zawahiri, al Qaeda’s second in command,
articulated a global vision in the summer of 2006: “War
with Israel is not subject to a treaty, cease-fire,
Sykes-Picot Treaty agreements, patriotism or disputed
borders, but it is jihad for the cause of God until the
entire religion is for is for him only. Jihad seeks the
liberation of Palestine, the entire country of Palestine
and to liberate every land that used to be a territory of
Islam, from Spain to Iraq. The entire world is an open
field for us . . . . With the grace of God we have now
returned to the field. . . . Dear Muslim brothers
everywhere, today we must target the Jewish and the
American interests everywhere.
4. Until November 2003, when adverse publicity compelled
them to take it down, the Islamic Affairs Department (IAD)
of the Saudi Arabian embassy in Washington carried this
statement of Islamic supremacism and belligerence on its
website: “The Muslims are required to raise the banner of
Jihad in order to make the Word of Allah supreme in this
world, to remove all forms of injustice and oppression, and
to defend the Muslims. If Muslims do not take up the sword,
the evil tyrants of this earth will be able to continue
oppressing the weak and [the] helpless.”
a) In other words, the antidote to tyranny is Islamic
law, and Muslims are obliged to wage war against
unbelievers to impose it; the spread of Islam must continue
at all costs.
b) There can be no half measures or peaceful coexistence
with unbelievers as equals on an indefinite basis.
c) As Egyptian jihad theorist and activist Sayyid Qutb
(1906-1966), whose works are still widely influential among
Muslims worldwide, put it in his jihad manifesto Milestones
(Ma’alim ‘ala Al-Tariq), which has circulated throughout
the world and been published in well over a thousand
editions: “Islam cannot accept any mixing with Jahiliyyah
[the society of unbelievers] . . . . The foremost duty of
Islam in this world is to depose Jahiliyyah from the
leadership of man, and to take the leadership into its own
hands and enforce the particular way of life which is its
permanent feature.”
5. Another influential jihadist writer, Sayyid Abul a’la
Madududi (1903-1979), shares Qutb’s perspective.
a) The author of several influential books, including
Jihad in Islam and the massive Towards Understanding the
Qur’an, Maududi was, like Qutb, not simply a theorist; in
1940 he founded the Jamaat-e-Islami (Muslim Party).
b) This organization still exists today in Pakistan,
India, and Bangladesh (as well as in Jammu and Kashmir,
which is one of the principal flashpoints of jihad
activity), and is dedicated to making these countries
Islamic states.
c) Maududi’s influence goes well beyond the
subcontinent; one admirer called him “the greatest
revivalist of Islam in the twentieth century” and pointed
out that his “writings and thoughts inspired similar
movements in a large part of the world.”
d) Maududi argues that Islam was inherently political,
not just religious in the sense in which most Westerners
understand the term, and that Muslims must wage war in
order to impose Islamic law upon the world.
e) To accommodationist Muslims of his day he declared:
“The truth is that Islam is not the name of a ‘Religion,’
nor is ‘Muslim’ the title of a ‘Nation.’ In reality Islam
is a revolutionary ideology and programme which seeks to
alter the social order of the whole world and rebuild it in
conformity with its own tenets and ideals ‘Muslim’ is the
title of that International Revolutionary Party organized
by Islam to carry into effect its revolutionary programme.
And ‘Jihad’ refers to that revolutionary struggle and
utmost exertion which the Islamic Party brings into play to
achieve this objective.”
f) Maududi envisioned this struggle, and the controlling
culture that Islam would become, as universal: “Islam
requires the earth - not just a portion, but the whole
planet -- not because the sovereignty over the earth should
be wrested from on Nation or several Nations and vested in
one particular Nation, but because the entire mankind
should benefit from. . .[Islam] which is the programme of
well-being for all humanity.”
(1) The well-being of all humanity would be best served
by the imposition of what Maududi saw as the laws of Allah
-- for he regarded allegiance to merely human laws as the
root of all societal evils: “No one has the right to become
a self-appointed ruler of men and issue orders and
prohibitions on his own volition and authority. To
acknowledge the personal authority of a human being as the
source of commands and prohibitions is tantamount to
admitting him as the sharer in the Powers and Authority of
God. And this is the root of all evils in the
universe.“
(2) The Muslims, the party of Allah, are accordingly
“left with no other choice except to capture State
Authority, for an evil system takes root and flourishes
under the patronage of an evil government and a pious
cultural order can never be established until the authority
of Government is wrested from the wicked and transferred
into the hands of the reformers. . . .[I]f the Muslim Party
commands adequate resources it will eliminate un-Islamic
Governments and establish the power of Islamic Government
in their stead.”
(3) This is, he says, exactly what Muhammad and the
first caliphs did: “It is the same policy which was
executed by the Holy Prophet (peace of Allah be upon him)
and his successor illustrious Caliphs (may Allah be pleased
with them). Arabia, where the Muslim Party was founded, was
the first country which was subjugated and brought under
the rule of Islam.”
g) Maududi further explains that “as soon as the Ummah
of Islam captures State power” it will therefore ban
various un-Islamic practices: the lending of money at
interest, “all forms of business and financial dealings
which are forbidden by Islamic Law,” gambling prostitution,
“and other vices,” and “it will make it obligatory for
non-Muslim women to observe the minimum standards of
modesty in dress as required by Islamic Law and will forbid
them to go about displaying their beauty like the days of
ignorance.” An Islamic state will also “clamp censorship on
the cinema.”
h) Non-Muslims may continue to live in such a state, but
they cannot hold political power within it: “Non-Muslims
have been granted the freedom to stay outside the Islamic
fold and to cling to their false, man-made ways if they so
wish. They have, however, absolutely no right to seize the
reins of power in any part of god’s earth nor to direct the
collective affairs of human beings according to their own
misconceived doctrines. . . .In such a situation the
believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost
to dislodge them from political power and to make them live
in subservience to the Islamic way of life.”
i) The political movement Maududi created,
Jamaat-e-Islami, is one of the largest political parties in
Pakistan today, and numerous government officials have
risen through its ranks.
(1) One of its former leaders in Pakistan, Qazi Hussain
Ahmed, stated that Jamaat-e-Islami believes “NOT in the
Western definition of ‘democracy,’ which assign[s] (in
principle though) all authority to the people. We believe
in the Authority of Allah and human being[s] as His
vicegerents. Thus ‘democracy’ in Islam is guided as well as
guarded.”
(2) The democracy that Ahmed envisions will need no
voting, for its principles are “quite clearly expounded in
the Qur’an and Sunnah.”
6. Egyptian jihadist Muhammad “Abdus Salam Faraj
(1952-19830), who, like Qutb, was executed by the Egyptian
government (in Faraj’s case, for his role in the
assassination of Egyptian president Anwar Sadat), wrote a
book entitled Jihad: The Absent Obligation that
crystallized many of these ideas.
a) “Allah revealed Islam,” he wrote, “in order that
humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is
darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not
suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are
responsible for the implementation of Allah’s Law on the
planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to
corrupt manmade laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to
establish the religion of Allah on the earth.”
b) Faraj’s book was found on the bookshelf of one of the
plotters of the July 21, 2005, terror attacks in Great
Britain.
7. This is also the view of the Islamic group Hizb
ut-Tahrir, which despite its protestations of peacefulness
is banned in many countries for its avowed determination to
establish an Islamic state.
a) A website expounding the group’s philosophy explains:
“Islam makes it a duty upon all Muslims to work to change
their countries from Dar al-Kufr [the land of unbelief] to
Dar al-Islam, and this can be achieved by establishing the
Islamic State, i.e., the Khilafah, and by electing a
Khaleefah [caliph and taking a bay’ah [oath of allegiance]
on him that he will rule by the Word of Allah (Subhaanahu
Wa Ta’Ala), i.e., he will implement Islamic laws in the
country where the Khilafah has been established. Then the
Muslims should work with the Khilafah to combine the rest
of the Islamic countries with it, hence the countries will
become Dar al-Islam and they will then carry Islam to the
world through invitation and jihad.”
b) “Invitation and jihad” -- but mostly jihad; an al
Qaeda manual discovered not long after September 11 in a
safe house in Manchester, England, declared: “Islamic
governments have never and will never be established
through peaceful solutions and cooperative councils. They
are established as they [always] have been by pen and gun,
by word and bullet, by tongue and teeth.”
(1) As Islamic governments have “never been established
through peaceful solutions,” it seems likely that although
“word,” “pen,” and “tongue” are mentioned, they quickly
give way to “gun,” “bullet,” and “teeth.”
(2) The manual continues: “Islamic government would
never be established except by the bomb and rifle. Islam
does not coincide or make a truce with unbelief, but rather
confronts it. The confrontation that Islam calls for with
these godless and apostate regimes does not know Socratic
debates, Platonic ideals, or Aristotelian diplomacy. But it
knows the dialogue of bullets, the ideals of assassination,
bombing, and destruction, and the diplomacy of the cannon
and machine-gun.”
God's Plan of Salvation
You must hear the gospel and then understand and recognize that you are lost without Jesus Christ no matter who you are and no matter what your background is. The Bible tells us that “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23) Before you can be saved, you must understand that you are lost and that the only way to be saved is by obedience to the gospel of Jesus Christ. (2 Thessalonians 1:8) Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6) “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)
You must believe and have faith in God because “without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.” (Hebrews 11:6) But neither belief alone nor faith alone is sufficient to save. (James 2:19; James 2:24; Matthew 7:21)
You must repent of your sins. (Acts 3:19) But repentance alone is not enough. The so-called “Sinner’s Prayer” that you hear so much about today from denominational preachers does not appear anywhere in the Bible. Indeed, nowhere in the Bible was anyone ever told to pray the “Sinner’s Prayer” to be saved. By contrast, there are numerous examples showing that prayer alone does not save. Saul, for example, prayed following his meeting with Jesus on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:11), but Saul was still in his sins when Ananias met him three days later (Acts 22:16). Cornelius prayed to God always, and yet there was something else he needed to do to be saved (Acts 10:2, 6, 33, 48). If prayer alone did not save Saul or Cornelius, it will not save you either. You must obey the gospel.
(2 Thess. 1:8)
You must confess that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. (Romans 10:9-10) Note that you do NOT need to make Jesus “Lord of your life.” Why? Because Jesus is already Lord of your life whether or not you have obeyed his gospel. Indeed, we obey him, not to make him Lord, but because he already is Lord. (Acts 2:36) Also, no one in the Bible was ever told to just “accept Jesus as your personal savior.” We must confess that Jesus is the Son of God, but, as with faith and repentance, confession alone does not save. (Matthew 7:21)
Having believed, repented, and confessed that Jesus is the Son of God, you must be baptized for the remission of your sins. (Acts 2:38) It is at this point (and not before) that your sins are forgiven. (Acts 22:16) It is impossible to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ without teaching the absolute necessity of baptism for salvation. (Acts 8:35-36; Romans 6:3-4; 1 Peter 3:21) Anyone who responds to the question in Acts 2:37 with an answer that contradicts Acts 2:38 is NOT proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ!
Once you are saved, God adds you to his church and writes your name in the Book of Life. (Acts 2:47; Philippians 4:3) To continue in God’s grace, you must continue to serve God faithfully until death. Unless they remain faithful, those who are in God’s grace will fall from grace, and those whose names are in the Book of Life will have their names blotted out of that book. (Revelation 2:10; Revelation 3:5; Galatians 5:4)