Question #249
I think I found a typo about infant baptism.
I have been reading with interest this article, but when I came to this section it seems there may be a “typo” in this sentence: “Infant baptism had its origin in the correct understanding that baptism is essential for salvation. " Shouldn’t it read: “Infant baptism had its origin in the incorrect understanding that baptism is not essential for salvation”. Have I misread something?
The Answer:
Yes, you have missed something, and no, the original sentence does not contain a typo. It is correct as written. Although infant baptism itself is a false doctrine, it (as with many false doctrines) came about through a false application of a true doctrine. In this case, the underlying true doctrine is that baptism is essential for salvation. The Catholics believed that baptism is essential, and it is for that reason (i.e., for fear infants would be lost absent baptism) that they baptized infants. What they failed to understand (and still fail to understand) is that infants have no need of baptism because they have not sinned. Your suggested replacement for the original sentence does not make sense – if the Catholics did not believe baptism was essential for salvation, then why were they in such a rush to baptize infants? In short, while Catholics have many problems, they understand more about the necessity of baptism than, for example, do the Baptists (who also have many problems).
Do you have more questions about the Bible? Then you have come to the right place! We have hundreds of answers to submitted questions, we have thousands of pages of detailed notes on Bible books (including Daniel, Zechariah, Revelation, Hosea, and Joel), we have hundreds of audio and video Bible classes, we have thousands of sermons (many in video), and we have much, much more! Please take a few minutes to look around, and don't forget to bookmark the site! Thanks for visiting!