What Makes a Great Sermon?
Preach the Word: Chapter 7
What makes a great sermon? Probably no two people would answer that question exactly alike. In fact, the same person might not give exactly the same answer if asked on two different occasions. Different ages and different teachers have answered differently. Change the question slightly (What makes a great speech?), and at least four different answers have come down from the classical rhetoricians. The Sophists gauged the greatness of a speech by the results that it obtained. Plato judged the greatness of a speech according to the truthfulness of its content. Quintillian conferred greatness based on the quality of life of the speaker. Aristotle’s mark of greatness was organization. All four are essential to a great sermon.
Surely a major requisite for a great sermon is its impact on the pew. The best organized truthful irrelevancy presented by the best of men fails as a sermon because it has no application for the hearers. Charles Spurgeon felt so strongly about the necessity for application that he reportedly said that the sermon doesn’t begin until the application begins. Paul taught doctrine, but he always called for it to be applied to life. Anything less than that is not Biblical truth. A preacher who fails to meaningfully apply God’s truth to his hearers is like a physician who gives a sick patient a lecture on health but fails to provide any healing medication.
But organization can be no less important, because, without organization, truthful relevant material presented by the best of men has no hope of impacting the pew. Organization is both a road map and a battle plan. It keeps the sermon on track from point of origination to destination; it keeps the hearer and the preacher marching together toward victory (conclusion) without distraction to the right or left. Each step follows naturally upon its predecessor and each is related to the whole so that the conclusion is not lost in confusion.
But what good is organization if that which is presented is not God’s truth? A sermon based on human wisdom is like cut flowers that fade before the close of day. There is no sense of the ageless struggles of the people of God. There is no coming to worship before the throne of the Creator of the universe and the Giver of grace. There is no proclamation of redemption because there is no Redeemer. There is no link forged between birth and death. It fails, and in its wake leaves nothing but despair.
Even if the standards of Plato, Aristotle, and the Sophists are admitted, surely Quintillian was wrong. Can a preacher not preach a great sermon though he himself is a scoundrel? Not if he is perceived as a scoundrel. Rightly or wrongly, it depends more on reputation than on character. Who listens an more to Jimmy Swaggert on morality? Who now cares what Jim Bakker says about honesty, integrity, or morality? On the other hand, have we not all known men whose eloquence of life and overflowing love enabled their words to fly straight to our hearts?
Some will argue that God, not man, determines true greatness. While that is beyond dispute, it should not be used, as it sometimes is, as an excuse to ignore such qualities as the impact on the hearer, organization, and the purity of life and heart of love of the preacher. When truth is proclaimed in a manner that leads to its rejection, God is not pleased. Such preaching will not make God’s list of great sermons.