Question #274
Is it a sin to eat blood?
In Gen. 9:4 God told Noah, the ancestor to all after the flood, that it is a sin to eat blood. This was confirmed in Acts 15. Yet some Christians say it is not a sin to eat blood, for example blood sausages. What is your stand on this issue?
The Answer:
There are those who argue that the issues included in the message to the Gentiles were just matters of loving brethren, particularly Gentiles respecting the sensitivities of Jewish believers who generally made up at least a portion of the so-called Gentile churches. See, Lenski’s comments on Acts 15:20. J.W. McGarvey comments seem closer to the truth:
The four things from which James proposed that the Gentiles should be required to abstain had been made unlawful, no by the Mosaic law, but by the revelations of the patriarchal age. From the beginning it had been known to the patriarchs that it was sinful to have any responsible connection with idols, or to indulge in fornication; and from the time of the law given to the race in the family of Noah, eating blood, and consequently eating things strangled which retained their blood within them, had been wrong, and it will continue to be so until the end of the world.
Having made those comments in the text of his commentary on Acts 15:20, McGarvey then added this footnote:
Farrar and Lightfoot, followed by others, hold that these provisions were intended to be temporary and local. Both refer for proof of this to Paul’s subsequent discussion of eating things offered to idols, assuming that he permitted it; and the former appeals to the fact that the Judaizing party in the church afterward disregarded the decree. (Farrar’s Life of Paul, 243, 244; Lightfoot on Galatians, 127 [1].) But the fact that it was repudiated afterward by the Judaizers only, shows that they deserved the stern rebukes which Paul administers to them in the epistle to the Galatians (i. 6-9; v. 1; vi. 12, 13); and in Paul’s discussion of the question, while he admits that to eat meat offered to idols is not sinful when the fact of its being so offered is no know to the eater; and while he shows that, if for no other reason, one should abstain on account of the harm which eating might do to the weak brethren; he finally takes the very position of the decree, forbidding it altogether as a communion with demons. See I Cor. Viii. 8-13; x. 14-22.
Do you have more questions about the Bible? Then you have come to the right place! We have hundreds of answers to submitted questions, we have thousands of pages of detailed notes on Bible books (including Daniel, Zechariah, Revelation, Hosea, and Joel), we have hundreds of audio and video Bible classes, we have thousands of sermons (many in video), and we have much, much more! Please take a few minutes to look around, and don't forget to bookmark the site! Thanks for visiting!