Question #225
I disagree with you about Song #577.
I notice that in your readers comments section you have posted only comments that agree with you and your philosophy. I wonder if you have any comments that disagree with your comments. Perhaps I am the only one who disagrees. For example: We Bow Down By Twila Paris. I see this song as a way of acknowledging the Lord in our own lives. Yes, He is King of all kings and Lord of all lords, but this song is making the declaration of those facts in ones personal life. Everyone will bow down upon Jesus’ return, but this song acknowledges that the singer is bowing down now…and upon bowing down, King of all kings you will be (in my life). I do not believe that the lyrics suggest that Jesus isn’t already King of all kings. They are suggesting that the one bowing down is simply making these facts a part their personal life. The Bible teaches that Jesus is all that this songs states, but it also implies that many will not bow down and acknowledge Christ as king until they are forced to. By singing this song you are saying "You will be…"all of these things in my life now.”
The Answer:
About the only thing ThyWordIsTruth tries to correct prior to publication is spelling and grammar. If you have read much of the website you realize that that effort often falls short even in items that originate here as opposed to questions. Rest assured that comments that disagree are in fact published. In fact, if you want to read some that hotly disagree, just go to the Questions and Answers section and read some of the questions. If you are looking for the company of others who disagree you will find them there. One of the big differences between your question and some (thankfully only a few), is that you, like the majority of those who disagree, do so with disagree without being disagreeable. Your disagreement is stated with sincerity and kindness.
However, there is still disagreement, so let’s look at it. First, it is suggested that how you and I may “feel” about the song is not the standard by which we should reach a conclusion as to its meaning. If you can have your feeling and I can have mind then we are approaching, if we have not fully arrived at, subjective truth – you have your truth and I have mine. The question is “What does the song say?” Comparing your explanation of your “feeling” with the words of the song demonstrates that your “feeling” or explanation is not supported by the words of the song. The only exception to that statement relates to “we bow down.” No one questions the propriety of bowing down before the Lord. What is questioned is the assertion that we “crown [him] the King.” Your explanation is that we crown him Lord of our life and that is what the song means even though that is not what it says. Assuming that that is correct, do we really crown him as King of our lives. IT IS SUBMITTED THAT MAN HAS NEVER CROWNED JESUS AND CAN NEVER CROWN JESUS AS KING OF HIS LIFE OR OF ANYTHING ELSE. True, man placed a crown of thorns upon Jesus’ head, but it was not to make him king of anything but to mock him for having said that he was a king. If the worshipper accepts the words of the song he will in fact accept the fact that man crowns Jesus king. Furthermore, the song does not say that Christ NOW becomes king of my life – It says “King of all kings you WILL [future tense] be. That is what the song says. If Christ has not been the king of your life before you crown him then certainly he is not King of all people, much less king of all kings. In fact, your explanation admits as much – “Everyone will [future tense] bow down upon Jesus’ return, but this song acknowledges that the singer is bowing down now…and upon bowing down, King of all kings you will be (in my life).” (Comment and emphasis added.) Christ is King of all whether they bow before him or not.
Assuming that that error could be avoided by an explanation that man is not really crowning Jesus as king, but is merely acknowledging that God has made Christ King, have you ever heard the song preceded by a statement that the song does not really mean what it says followed by a statement of what it really means? Probably not. Most likely certainly not. Most worshippers may thoughtlessly assume that there is nothing wrong with the song – they just assume that the one entrusted with leading worship in song would not lead the song if it were not scriptural. The leader may have assumed that the song would not be in the book if it were not scriptural. The result is that nobody “vets” either this song or others that we sing. When either preaching or singing is treated so cavalierly, error can be easily introduced.
Do you have more questions about the Bible? Then you have come to the right place! We have hundreds of answers to submitted questions, we have thousands of pages of detailed notes on Bible books (including Daniel, Zechariah, Revelation, Hosea, and Joel), we have hundreds of audio and video Bible classes, we have thousands of sermons (many in video), and we have much, much more! Please take a few minutes to look around, and don't forget to bookmark the site! Thanks for visiting!